- Why commit to 15+ years, billions over budget, and radioactive risk — when clean baseload power is already here?
Let’s compare:
️Flamanville 3 (France):
Started: 2007
Output: 1,650 MW
Commissioning: ⚠️ 2025 (17 years later)
Final Cost: €19.1B
Delay: 12 years
Olkiluoto 3 (Finland):
Started: 2005
Output: 1,600 MW
Commissioning: ⚠️ 2023
Delay: 14 years
Final Cost: €8.5B
Akkuyu (Türkiye):
Start to finish: ~10 years
$22B, still not fully online
Now meet the new benchmark:
☀️ Masdar 24/7 Dispatchable Renewable Power (UAE)
5.2 GWp Solar PV + 19 GWh BESS
1 GW of continuous, clean, baseload power
⏳ COD: Just 3 years (2024–2027)
Investment: ~$6B
⚡️ Ideal for AI data centers, digital infrastructure, and industrial off-takers
♻️ Zero nuclear waste
⚠️ Zero radiation risk
🛠 Built faster, cleaner, and smarter
In a world racing toward AI, electrification, and net zero — we don’t have time for delays.
Masdar’s project is proof: Renewables can now do baseload — efficiently, safely, and on time.
The future isn’t nuclear. The future is scalable, solar-powered, and battery-backed.
download insight here: Masdar_vs_Nuclear_Energy_Comparison